Problem with real and imaginary part of dielectric functions

Question on input files/tags, interpreting output, etc.

Please check whether the answer to your question is given in the VASP online manual or has been discussed in this forum previously!

Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator

Post Reply
Message
Author
chandan_kumarvishwakarma1
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:56 am

Problem with real and imaginary part of dielectric functions

#1 Post by chandan_kumarvishwakarma1 » Wed Jan 12, 2022 1:42 pm

Dear Users,

I am trying to calculate real and imaginary part of dielectric function using
LOPTICS tag. But in the output for Imaginary part and real part, I am getting 0 and 1 respectively. And at the end,
" The outermost node in the dielectric function lies at epsilon= -1.0 "
this is printing.
For your reference, I am attaching inputs and output (vasprun.xml and OUTCAR).
files_nbt.zip
Please help me out.

---
Chandan
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

alexey.tal
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 229
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2021 12:45 pm

Re: Problem with real and imaginary part of dielectric functions

#2 Post by alexey.tal » Thu Jan 13, 2022 9:45 am

Dear Chandan,

I found that some of the bands in your OUTCAR are partially occupied, but the PEAD method is not supported for metallic systems.
You can try to reduce the smearing width (SIGMA) to ensure that your system does have a bandgap.

chandan_kumarvishwakarma1
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:56 am

Re: Problem with real and imaginary part of dielectric functions

#3 Post by chandan_kumarvishwakarma1 » Thu Jan 13, 2022 1:41 pm

Dear Alexey,

Thank you for your reply.
I reduced the SIGMA to 0.05 and, it worked!!
But, The plot is not smooth. How can I smooth the curve for publishable results.

---
Chandan

alexey.tal
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 229
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2021 12:45 pm

Re: Problem with real and imaginary part of dielectric functions

#4 Post by alexey.tal » Thu Jan 13, 2022 5:17 pm

If you would like to apply larger smearing you can use the tetrahedron method (ISMEAR = -5). Also, you can try increasing the number of grid points in the dielectric function (NEDOS = 2001) to get a smoother spectrum.

chandan_kumarvishwakarma1
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:56 am

Re: Problem with real and imaginary part of dielectric functions

#5 Post by chandan_kumarvishwakarma1 » Sat Jan 15, 2022 10:47 am

Dear Alexey,

Thank you for your reply.
As I tried the tetrahedron method (ISMEAR = -5), but it printed the following error,
"Integration of the imaginary part of the dielectric function by means of the tetrahedron method is not supported for metallic systems."

Apart from this, I also tried to repeat the same calculation for hetrostructure and for that case same issue is there even I tried to reduce the SIGMA to 0.05.
Please comment on the same in details so that I can rectify the problem by myself.

---
Regards
Chandan

alexey.tal
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 229
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2021 12:45 pm

Re: Problem with real and imaginary part of dielectric functions

#6 Post by alexey.tal » Mon Jan 17, 2022 12:44 pm

This error again is related to the fact that some of the orbitals are partially occupied.
Sorry, my previous answer might have been misleading. The broadening of the dielectric function is determined by the complex shift CSHIFT, so you can get a larger broadening of the dielectric function with ISMEAR=0 by increasing CSHIFT.

chandan_kumarvishwakarma1
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:56 am

Re: Problem with real and imaginary part of dielectric functions

#7 Post by chandan_kumarvishwakarma1 » Sat Jan 29, 2022 10:43 am

Dear Alexey,

Thank you for your reply.
it worked!!

---
Chandan

Post Reply