Band level filling has no sharp cut-off at Fermi energy !?

Question on input files/tags, interpreting output, etc.

Please check whether the answer to your question is given in the VASP online manual or has been discussed in this forum previously!

Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator

Post Reply
Message
Author
lahaye
Jr. Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 98
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 5:08 am
Location: Suwon - Korea

Band level filling has no sharp cut-off at Fermi energy !?

#1 Post by lahaye » Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:08 am

Hi all,

I have a structure of 14 ions more or less in a plane. The structure has
a mirror plane perpendicular to the structure.

The PROCAR file has all the bands / k-points with their occupancies.
Very low energy levels have an occupancy of 2.000, but approaching
the Fermi energy, the occupancies gradually decrease, which continues
above the Fermi energy.
And also: some levels below the fermi energy have occupancies over
2.000 !?!?!

I'd expect all occupancies to be 2.0000, which abrupty changes to
0.0000 at the fermi energy.

So to me this is very strange, as if there is some kind of thermal energy.
I use as smearing the tetrahedron with Blochl corrections (SIGMA=0.001).

Any idea what is the reason for this?

I use PAW potentials and the INCAR file is like this:

Code: Select all

PREC  = Accurate
EDIFF = 1E-5
LREAL = Auto
NEDOS  = 1001
ISMEAR = -5
SIGMA  = 0.001
LORBIT = 12
NBANDS = 39
KPOINTS file is like this:

Code: Select all

k-points with Monckhorst-Pack
0
Monkhorst-Pack
9 9 9
0 0 0
A printout of energy vs. occupancy of the energies around
the fermi energy is here:
http://surfion.snu.ac.kr/~lahaye/vasp/Fermi

Thanks,
Rob.
Last edited by lahaye on Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:08 am, edited 1 time in total.

admin
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2922
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:18 am
License Nr.: 458

Band level filling has no sharp cut-off at Fermi energy !?

#2 Post by admin » Wed Nov 29, 2006 1:26 pm

first of all, please check if
1) your system really has a gap for all k-points
2) you have even/odd NELECT

please mind that
-- the tetrahedron method does not use SIGMA to calculate the weights of the states
-- the Bloechl corrections to the tetrahedron method may lead to occupancies >2 and [ Edited Fri Dec 01 2006, 01:58PM ]
Last edited by admin on Wed Nov 29, 2006 1:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.

simly
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 8:01 am

Band level filling has no sharp cut-off at Fermi energy !?

#3 Post by simly » Thu Dec 28, 2006 1:12 am

Hi,
My system is negatively charged (odd NELECT). This leads to occupancies >2 and <0 in the OUTCAR.
The system should have a bandgap . How do I then interpret the occupancies >2 and <0 found?

Thanks for your help!~ :)
Last edited by simly on Thu Dec 28, 2006 1:12 am, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply