LEXCH tag in POTCAR

Question on input files/tags, interpreting output, etc.

Please check whether the answer to your question is given in the VASP online manual or has been discussed in this forum previously!

Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator

Post Reply
Message
Author
KWH
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2018 2:05 am
License Nr.: 5-1063

LEXCH tag in POTCAR

#1 Post by KWH » Fri May 03, 2024 12:04 am

I want to use the optPBE functional and PBE_PAW POTCAR files. I see in the wiki that I should set GGA=OR.

What is confusing me is this note in the wiki:
"Important: VASP recalculates the exchange-correlation energy inside the PAW sphere and corrects the atomic energies given by the POTCAR file. For this to work, the original LEXCH tag must not be modified in the POTCAR file."

I don't see any mention of LEXCH in the section on the POTCAR and the GGA section does not say how LEXCH should be set for the different GGA's. The section on LEXCH seems to indicate that PAW_PBE potentials are the default for GGA. Further, inside the PAW-PBE files LEXCH is set to PE.

So, can I just ignore the note so long as I am using the PAW_PBE potentials?

Thanks

fabien_tran1
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 367
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2021 11:02 am

Re: LEXCH tag in POTCAR

#2 Post by fabien_tran1 » Fri May 03, 2024 7:23 am

Hi,

The note on the wiki at the page GGA is correct and is there to avoid that users modify LEXCH. The LEXCH tag in the POTCAR indicates which functional was used to generate the data (pseudopotential) in the POTCAR. Therefore, LEXCH (and the POTCAR in general) must never be modified. If a functional other than PBE (e.g., GGA=OR) is specified in the INCAR, then a correction (OR minus PBE) for the energy of the atoms is calculated during the calculation. Using a POTCAR generated by PBE for a calculation with another functional (another GGA, a MGGA or a hybrid) is somehow inconsistent, but this is usually not a problem for accuracy. More discussion can also be found at https://www.vasp.at/forum/viewtopic.php?t=18315.

Post Reply