Parallelization: Difference between revisions

From VASP Wiki
Line 49: Line 49:
; {{TAG|NTAUPAR}}: Parallelize over imaginary time points in GW and RPA calculations.
; {{TAG|NTAUPAR}}: Parallelize over imaginary time points in GW and RPA calculations.
; {{TAG|NOMEGAPAR}}: Parallelize over imaginary frequency points in GW and RPA calculations.
; {{TAG|NOMEGAPAR}}: Parallelize over imaginary frequency points in GW and RPA calculations.
; {{TAG|KPAR}}: For Laplace transformed MP2 this tag [[LTMP2_-_Tutorial#Parallelization|has a different meaning]].


==OpenMP/OpenACC==
==OpenMP/OpenACC==

Revision as of 13:34, 6 April 2022

For many complex problems, a single core is not enough to finish the calculation in a reasonable time. VASP makes use of parallel machines splitting the calculation into many tasks. By default, VASP distributes the number of bands (NBANDS) over the available cores. But it is often beneficial to add parallelization over the FFTs (NCORE), the k points (KPAR), and separate calculations (IMAGES). All these tags default to 1 and divide the number of cores among the parallelization options. There are also additional parallelization options for some algorithms in VASP.

VASP makes use of OpenMP and OpenACC when possible. Note that these options conflict with the NCORE parallelization.

Optimizing the parallelization

Tip: We offer only general advice here. The performance for specific systems may be significantly different. However, in many cases, one is interested in similar calculations. Then run a few of these cases varying the parallel setup and use the optimal choice of parameters for the rest.

When choosing the optimal performance try to get as close as possible to the actual system. This includes both the physical system (atoms, cell size, cutoff, ...) as well as the computational hardware (CPUs, interconnect, number of nodes, ...). If too many parameters are different, the parallel configuration may not be transferable to the production calculation. Nevertheless, a few steps of repetitive tasks give a good idea of an optimal choice for the full calculation. For example, running only a few electronic or ionic self-consistency steps instead of finishing the convergence.

Often, combining multiple parallelization options yields the fastest results because the parallel efficiency of each level drops near its limit. For the default option (band parallelization), the limit is NBANDS divided by a small integer. Note that VASP will increase NBANDS to match the number of cores. Choose NCORE as a factor of the cores per node to avoid communicating between nodes for the FFTs. Recall that OpenMP and OpenACC enforce that NCORE is not set. The k-point parallelization is efficient but requires additional memory. Given sufficient memory, increase KPAR up to the number of irreducible k points. Keep in mind that KPAR should factorize the number of k points. Finally, IMAGES is required to split several VASP runs into separate calculations. The limit is dictated by the number of desired calculations.

Caveat about the MPI setup

The MPI setup determines the placement of the threads onto the nodes. VASP assumes the threads first fill up a node before the next node is occupied. As an example when running with 8 cores on two nodes, VASP expects thread 1–4 on node 1 and thread 5–8 on node 2. If the threads are placed differently, communication between the nodes occurs for every FFT. Because FFTs are essential to VASP's speed this inhibits the performance of the calculation. A manifestation is an increase in computing time when the number of nodes is increased from 1 to 2. If NCORE is not used this issue is less severe but will still reduce the performance.

To address this issue, please check the setup of the MPI library and the submitted job script. It is usually possible to overwrite the placement by setting environment variables or command-line arguments. When in doubt, contact the HPC administration of your machine to investigate the behavior.

Additional parallelization options

NTAUPAR
Parallelize over imaginary time points in GW and RPA calculations.
NOMEGAPAR
Parallelize over imaginary frequency points in GW and RPA calculations.
KPAR
For Laplace transformed MP2 this tag has a different meaning.

OpenMP/OpenACC

Both OpenMP and OpenACC parallelize the FFTs and therefore disregard any conflicting specification of NCORE. When combining these methods OpenACC takes precedence but any code not ported to OpenACC benefits from the additional OpenMP treads. This approach is relevant because the recommended NVIDIA Collective Communications Library requires a single MPI thread per GPU.