ENCUT Convergence Graph Shape and KE Error Subtraction

Queries about input and output files, running specific calculations, etc.


Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator

Post Reply
Message
Author
emilyherrmann
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2026 8:54 pm

ENCUT Convergence Graph Shape and KE Error Subtraction

#1 Post by emilyherrmann » Sun Jun 14, 2026 7:57 pm

Hello,

I am carrying out convergence tests on a primitive cell of Cu 110, and my ENCUT convergence does data does not follow the monotonic decreasing shape I expected. The data is pasted here, and I attached a screenshot of a graph (the yellow vertical lines represent ENMAX from my POTCAR and 1.3 times that ENMAX; the green horizontal line is the converged E0 from running ENCUT = 1500 eV):

ENCUTConvergenceGraph.png

ENCUT (eV) E0 (eV) Total KE Error (eV) E0 - Error (eV)
340 1.7788297 0.559 1.2198297
350 1.7066254 0.412 1.2946254
360 1.656368 0.3176 1.338768
370 1.61637 0.26 1.35637
380 1.5886873 0.2268 1.3618873
390 1.5696191 0.2088 1.3608191
400 1.5568727 0.1992 1.3576727
410 1.5494803 0.1942 1.3552803
420 1.5460972 0.191 1.3550972
430 1.5450792 0.1878 1.3572792
440 1.5454986 0.1842 1.3612986
450 1.5471415 0.1796 1.3675415
460 1.5509194 0.1726 1.3783194
470 1.5552163 0.1638 1.3914163
480 1.5600601 0.1534 1.4066601
490 1.5649083 0.1422 1.4227083
500 1.5694021 0.131 1.4384021
510 1.5732593 0.1196 1.4536593
520 1.5772663 0.1082 1.4690663
530 1.5813783 0.0964 1.4849783
540 1.5859612 0.0846 1.5013612
550 1.5896621 0.0738 1.5158621
560 1.5921237 0.0648 1.5273237
570 1.5937066 0.0574 1.5363066
580 1.5948015 0.051 1.5438015
590 1.5962719 0.0448 1.5514719
600 1.5978221 0.039 1.5588221
610 1.5991327 0.0342 1.5649327
620 1.5998809 0.0304 1.5694809
630 1.6003667 0.0274 1.5729667
640 1.6005178 0.0252 1.5753178
650 1.6006121 0.0234 1.5772121
660 1.6006477 0.0218 1.5788477
670 1.600599 0.0206 1.579999

Currently, my POSCAR is as follows. I am using the Cu_pv POTCAR and a 12x12x12 gamma centered k-point mesh. Eventually I will be adsorbing a molecule of an organic semiconductor on it, but first I wanted to converge values for just the Cu:

Cu110
2.590000
1.02130383981529 -0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000
-0.00000000000000 1.44021611736692 0.00000000000000
0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000 1.02130383981529
Cu
2
Selective Dynamics
Direct
0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000 T T T Cu
0.50000000000000 0.50000000000000 0.50000000000000 T T T Cu

My INCAR tags are as follows:

ENCUT = 340
PREC = Accurate
IBRION = -1
NSW = 0
EDIFF = 0.000001
ISMEAR = 0
SIGMA = 0.05
LWAVE=.FALSE.
GGA = ML
LUSE_VDW = .TRUE.
ZAB_VDW = -1.8867
AGGAC = 0.0000
LASPH = .TRUE.

My specific questions are:
1) Why is E0 increasing toward convergence instead of decreasing? If I stop using a van der Waals functional, the E0 becomes negative, but the overall shape is unchanged. Is this indicative of some problem in my system?

2) Why does subtracting the KE error change the early shape so dramatically? I am getting the KE error from the OUTCAR line that reads "kinetic energy error for atom" then subtracting that for each atoms of the species (in this case, I subtracted it twice since I have two Cu). Once I subtract the error, the energy does change mostly monotonically toward convergence, just in the increasing direction instead of the decreasing direction. I have read a tutorial from Danny van Poucke (https://dannyvanpoucke.be/vasp-tutor-co ... esting-en/) that shows similar corrected vs uncorrected behavior to my data, except for at the small ENCUT values.

Thank you!
Emily

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Post Reply