Calculation of atoms: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "The following files are needed for the calculation of atoms *{{TAG|INCAR}} *{{TAG|POSCAR}} *{{TAG|POTCAR}} *{{TAG|KPOINTS}} Before using a pseudopotential intensively it is n...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
A simple cubic cell can be often enough but it is usually recommended to use nearly cubic cells with minimal orthorombic distortion. This can be important for some atoms due to higher degrees of freedom for relaxation. The size of the cell depends on the element in question. Some values for reliable results are compiled in Tab. 1. | A simple cubic cell can be often enough but it is usually recommended to use nearly cubic cells with minimal orthorombic distortion. This can be important for some atoms due to higher degrees of freedom for relaxation. The size of the cell depends on the element in question. Some values for reliable results are compiled in Tab. 1. | ||
Revision as of 14:49, 24 June 2019
The following files are needed for the calculation of atoms
Before using a pseudopotential intensively it is not only necessary to check it in different bulk phases but the pseudopotential should also reproduce exactly the eigenvalues and the total energy of the free atom for which it was created. If energy cutoff and cell size are sufficient, the agreement between the atomic reference calculation and a calculation using VASP is normally better than 1 meV. Calculations for an atom are relatively fast and unproblematic in most cases.
For the calculation only the point should be used i.e. the KPOINTS file should have the following contents:
Monkhorst Pack 0 Monkhorst Pack 1 1 1 0 0 0
A simple cubic cell can be often enough but it is usually recommended to use nearly cubic cells with minimal orthorombic distortion. This can be important for some atoms due to higher degrees of freedom for relaxation. The size of the cell depends on the element in question. Some values for reliable results are compiled in Tab. 1.