At and mol further: Difference between revisions

From VASP Wiki
(Created page with "{{Template:At_and_mol}} *How does the energy change when one decreases {{TAG|SIGMA}} to 0.001 in the {{TAG|INCAR}} file starting from the {{TAG|O_atom}}? Why? *Try to copy {...")
 
No edit summary
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Template:At_and_mol}}
{{Template:At_and_mol - Tutorial}}


*How does the energy change when one decreases {{TAG|SIGMA}} to 0.001 in the {{TAG|INCAR}} file starting from the {{TAG|O_atom}}? Why?
*How does the energy change when one decreases {{TAG|SIGMA}} to 0.001 in the {{TAG|INCAR}} file starting from the [[O_atom? Why?


*Try to copy {{TAG|CONTCAR}} to {{TAG|POSCAR}} after running the example {{TAG|O_dimer}}. Why is the calculation so fast?
*Try to copy {{FILE|CONTCAR}} to {{FILE|POSCAR}} after running the example {{TAG|O_dimer}}. Why is the calculation so fast?


*Try to play with the parameter {{TAG|POTIM}} for the example {{TAG|O_dimer}}. What is the optimal value?
*Try to play with the parameter {{TAG|POTIM}} for the example {{TAG|O_dimer}}. What is the optimal value?


*What is the reason for the imaginary frequency in the example {{TAG|CO_vibration}}? Does the behaviour improve when the step width (smaller or larger) is changed? Also try to improve the precision to which the ground state is converged ({{TAG|EDIFF}}=1E-5). What happens if the accuracy of the calculations is improved ({{TAG|PREC}}=''Accurate''}}).
*What is the reason for the imaginary frequency in the example {{TAG|CO_vibration}}? Does the behaviour improve when the step width (smaller or larger) is changed? Also try to improve the precision to which the ground state is converged ({{TAG|EDIFF}}=1E-5). What happens if the accuracy of the calculations is improved ({{TAG|PREC}}=''Accurate'').


*Try to use the conjugate gradient algorithm to the <math>\mathrm{H}_{2}\mathrm{O}</math> molecule (example {{TAG|H2O}}).
*Try to use the conjugate gradient algorithm to the <math>\mathrm{H}_{2}\mathrm{O}</math> molecule (example [[H2O]]).


*Calculate the vibrational frequencies of the <math>\mathrm{H}_{2}\mathrm{O}</math> molecule (example {{TAG|H2O}}) after relaxation (example {{TAG|H2Ovib}}). Why does one find 3 modes that have small frequencies? Try {{TAG|EDIFF}}=1E-5 instead of {{TAG|EDIFF}}=1E-4.
*Calculate the vibrational frequencies of the <math>\mathrm{H}_{2}\mathrm{O}</math> molecule (example [[H2O]]) after relaxation (example [[H2O vibration]]). Why does one find 3 modes that have small frequencies? Try {{TAG|EDIFF}}=1E-5 instead of {{TAG|EDIFF}}=1E-4.


   
   
----
{{Template:At_and_mol}}
[[VASP_example_calculations|To the list of examples]] or to the [[The_VASP_Manual|main page]]
 


[[Category:Examples]]
[[Category:Examples]]

Latest revision as of 13:16, 14 November 2019

  • How does the energy change when one decreases SIGMA to 0.001 in the INCAR file starting from the [[O_atom? Why?
  • Try to play with the parameter POTIM for the example O_dimer. What is the optimal value?
  • What is the reason for the imaginary frequency in the example CO_vibration? Does the behaviour improve when the step width (smaller or larger) is changed? Also try to improve the precision to which the ground state is converged (EDIFF=1E-5). What happens if the accuracy of the calculations is improved (PREC=Accurate).
  • Try to use the conjugate gradient algorithm to the molecule (example H2O).
  • Calculate the vibrational frequencies of the molecule (example H2O) after relaxation (example H2O vibration). Why does one find 3 modes that have small frequencies? Try EDIFF=1E-5 instead of EDIFF=1E-4.