Slow-growth approach: Difference between revisions

From VASP Wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
In the limit of infinitesimally small <math>\dot{\xi}</math>, the work <math>w^{irrev}_{1 \rightarrow 2}</math>
In the limit of infinitesimally small <math>\dot{\xi}</math>, the work <math>w^{irrev}_{1 \rightarrow 2}</math>
corresponds to the free-energy difference between the the final and initial state.
corresponds to the free-energy difference between the the final and initial state.
In the general case, <math>w^{irrev}_{1 \rightarrow 2}$ </math>is the irreversible work related
In the general case, <math>w^{irrev}_{1 \rightarrow 2}</math> is the irreversible work related
to the free energy via Jarzynski's identity<ref name="jarzynski1997"/>:
to the free energy via Jarzynski's identity<ref name="jarzynski1997"/>:


Line 61: Line 61:
</references>
</references>
----
----
[[The_VASP_Manual|Contents]]


[[Category:Molecular dynamics]][[Category:Slow-growth approach]][[Category:Theory]][[Category:Howto]]
[[Category:Molecular dynamics]][[Category:Slow-growth approach]][[Category:Theory]][[Category:Howto]]

Latest revision as of 10:27, 16 November 2023

The free-energy profile along a geometric parameter can be scanned by an approximate slow-growth approach[1]. In this method, the value of is linearly changed from the value characteristic for the initial state (1) to that for the final state (2) with a velocity of transformation . The resulting work needed to perform a transformation can be computed as:

In the limit of infinitesimally small , the work corresponds to the free-energy difference between the the final and initial state. In the general case, is the irreversible work related to the free energy via Jarzynski's identity[2]:

Note that calculation of the free-energy via this equation requires averaging of the term over many realizations of the transformation. Detailed description of the simulation protocol that employs Jarzynski's identity can be found in reference [3].

Anderson thermostat

  • For a slow-growth simulation, one has to perform a calcualtion very similar to Constrained molecular dynamics but additionally the transformation velocity-related INCREM-tag for each geometric parameter with STATUS=0 has to be specified. For a slow-growth approach run with Andersen thermostat, one has to:
  1. Set the standard MD-related tags: IBRION=0, TEBEG, POTIM, and NSW
  2. Set MDALGO=1, and choose an appropriate setting for ANDERSEN_PROB
  3. Define geometric constraints in the ICONST-file, and set the STATUS parameter for the constrained coordinates to 0
  4. When the free-energy gradient is to be computed, set LBLUEOUT=.TRUE.
  1. Specify the transformation velocity-related INCREM-tag for each geometric parameter with STATUS=0.

Nose-Hoover thermostat

  • For a slow-growth approach run with Nose-Hoover thermostat, one has to:
  1. Set the standard MD-related tags: IBRION=0, TEBEG, POTIM, and NSW
  2. Set MDALGO=2, and choose an appropriate setting for SMASS
  3. Define geometric constraints in the ICONST-file, and set the STATUS parameter for the constrained coordinates to 0
  4. When the free-energy gradient is to be computed, set LBLUEOUT=.TRUE.
  1. Specify the transformation velocity-related INCREM-tag for each geometric parameter with STATUS=0


VASP can handle multiple (even redundant) constraints. Note, however, that a too large number of constraints can cause problems with the stability of the SHAKE algorithm. In problematic cases, it is recommended to use a looser convergence criterion (see SHAKETOL) and to allow a larger number of iterations (see SHAKEMAXITER) in the SHAKE algorithm. Hard constraints may also be used in metadynamics simulations (see MDALGO=11 | 21). Information about the constraints is written onto the REPORT-file: check the lines following the string: Const_coord

References